2003 - 2004 LEGISLATURE
February 5, 2003 -
Introduced by Senators REYNOLDS, BROWN, COWLES, S.
FITZGERALD, HARSDORF, KANAVAS, KEDZIE, LAZICH, LEIBHAM, ROESSLER, SCHULTZ,
STEPP, WELCH and ZIEN, cosponsored by Representatives OWENS, ALBERS, BIES,
J. FITZGERALD, FREESE, GIELOW, GOTTLIEB, GROTHMAN, GUNDERSON, GUNDRUM, HAHN,
HINES, HUNDERTMARK, HUEBSCH, JESKEWITZ, KERKMAN, KESTELL, KRAWCZYK, LADWIG,
F. LASEE, LOEFFELHOLZ, LEMAHIEU, D. MEYER, NASS, NISCHKE, OTT, PETROWSKI,
PETTIS, SERATTI, STONE, SUDER, VRAKAS, VUKMIR, WEBER, J. WOOD and
ZIEGELBAUER.
Referred to Committee on Labor, Small Business Development and Consumer
Affairs.
AN ACT to renumber and amend 111.337 (1); and
to create 111.337 (1) (b) and 450.135 of the statutes; relating to:
employment discrimination based on creed and exemption from liability and
discipline for pharmacists who refuse to dispense for abortions, assisted
suicides, and euthanasia.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and
assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. 111.337 (1) of the statutes is renumbered 111.337 (1) (intro.)
and amended to read:
111.337 (1) (intro.) Employment discrimination because of creed includes,
but is not limited to, refusing any of the following:
(a) Refusing to reasonably accommodate an employee's
or prospective employee's religious observance or practice unless the
employer can demonstrate that the accommodation would pose an undue hardship
on the employer's program, enterprise, or business.
SECTION 2. 111.337 (1) (b) of the statutes is created to read:
111.337 (1) (b) Discriminating against any pharmacist licensed under ch.
450 by engaging in any of the actions prohibited under s. 111.322 on the
basis of the pharmacist's refusal to dispense a prescribed drug or device
because the pharmacist believes that the drug or device would be used for
the purpose of any of the following:
1. Causing an abortion, as defined in s. 253.10 (2)
(a).
2. Causing the death of any person, if the pharmacist
consults with the practitioner who prescribed the drug or device before the
pharmacist makes the refusal.
SECTION 3. 450.135 of the statutes is created to read:
450.135 Pharmacist's refusal to dispense for abortions, assisted
suicides, and euthanasia.
(1) In this section, "abortion" has the meaning given in s. 253.10 (2)
(a).
(2) No pharmacist may be required to dispense a prescribed drug or device
if the pharmacist has reason to believe that the drug or device would be
used for the purpose of any of the following:
(a) Causing an abortion.
(b) Causing the death of any person, if the
pharmacist consults with the practitioner who prescribed the drug or device
before the pharmacist makes the refusal.
(3) A pharmacist's refusal to dispense a prescribed drug or device
because he or she has reason to believe that the drug or device would be
used for a purpose described in sub. (2) (a) or (b) may not be the basis for
any of the following:
(a) A claim for damages against the pharmacist or the
pharmacy of the pharmacist.
(b) Disciplinary action by the board or department
against the pharmacist.
SECTION 4.0Initial applicability.
(1) This act first applies to refusals made on the effective date of this
subsection.
This bill provides that a pharmacist licensed by the Pharmacy Examining
Board (board) in the Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL) may not be
required to dispense a prescribed drug or device if the pharmacist has
reason to believe that the drug or device would be used for causing an
abortion. An "abortion" is defined as the use of an instrument, medicine,
drug, or other substance or device with the intent to terminate the
pregnancy of a woman known to be pregnant or for whom there is reason to
believe that she may be pregnant. In addition, there must be no intent to
increase the probability of a live birth, to preserve the life or health of
the infant after live birth, or to remove a dead fetus. Also under the bill,
a licensed pharmacist may not be required to dispense a drug or device if
the pharmacist has reason to believe that the drug or device would be used
for causing the death of a person, if the pharmacist consults with the
practitioner who prescribed the drug or device.
The bill also provides that a pharmacist's refusal to dispense a
prescribed drug or device because he or she has reason to believe that the
drug or device would be used for a purpose described above may not be the
basis for a claim for damages against the pharmacist or the pharmacist's
pharmacy. Also, such a refusal may not be the basis for disciplinary action
by the board or DRL against the pharmacist. This bill expands the definition
of employment discrimination based on creed. Under current law, "creed" is
defined as a system of religious beliefs, including moral or ethical beliefs
about right and wrong, that a person sincerely holds with the strength of
traditional religious views. Employment discrimination based on creed is
defined to include refusing to accommodate reasonably an employee's or
prospective employee's religious observances or practices unless the
employer can demonstrate that the accommodation would pose an undue
hardship. The bill also expands the definition of employment discrimination
based on creed to include discriminating against a pharmacist on the basis
of his or her refusal, based on creed, to dispense a prescribed drug or
device that the pharmacist has reason to believe would be used for causing
an abortion or causing the death of a person. Under the bill, discrimination
includes refusing to hire a pharmacist, terminating a pharmacist's
employment, and discriminating against a pharmacist with respect to
promotions, compensation, or terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.
There is no exception for an employer to show that the pharmacist's refusal
poses an undue hardship.