Protection of Conscience Project
Protection of Conscience Project
www.consciencelaws.org
Service, not Servitude

Service, not Servitude

Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State
Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Conscience?
US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (16 February, 2012)

Testimony of Laura Champion, M.D.

Medical Director, Calvin College Health Services

This is not about politics, this is not about contraception, and this is not about depriving women of health care. . . This is about my daily life as a physician, a Christian, and a Medical Services Director.

Good morning Chairman Issa and Ranking Member Cummings:

[PDF File]  I appreciate your invitation to share my concerns about the contraceptive mandate. My name is Dr. Laura Champion and I am the medical director and a practicing physician at Calvin College Health Services in Grand Rapids, Michigan. I graduated from the University of Washington School of Medicine in 1996 and have been Board Certified in Family Medicine since 1999. I provided primary care in a private practice in Grand Rapids, MI until June 2011 when I assumed the medical director role at Calvin College. I want to share my concerns with you as a person who medically understands what is at stake and who has the responsibility for negotiating and providing the student insurance coverage to the students at Calvin College, a private, accredited, four-year, Christian liberal arts college. We are an institution whose religious character and mission is central to everything we are and everything we do.

Contraception is not controversial at our school. Clinicians write prescriptions that include contraception for a variety of reasons, including the prevention of pregnancy.

I am concerned about the many specific facets of these regulations and I am concerned as a health provider about the wide sweeping regulatory overreach that the mandate on contraceptives signals. Contraception is not controversial at our school. Clinicians write prescriptions that include contraception for a variety of reasons, including the prevention of pregnancy. However, abortifacient agents are not prescribed, nor are they covered in our health care plan. The advocacy of these agents is profoundly inconsistent with the belief system of our college and our religion. To force the access of such agents upon our students would violate our religious liberty. Calvin College is committed to ethical, moral and spiritual higher education. To teach one set of values and beliefs and then to provide abortifacient agents for students would lack integrity. We cannot expect to train ethically minded leaders for the future and then require a compromise of values and beliefs by the colleges and universities that supply such leaders.

Requiring coverage of abortificient agents is in direct contradiction to the spiritual and behavioral standards that Calvin College expects of ourselves and our students.

I want to underscore that our College and our Health Services Department would be severely harmed by the mandate requiring abortion causing drugs. We challenge our students to live out the values they believe. Our intent and purpose is that our entire faculty, staff, and students are living examples of believers trying to follow in the footsteps of Jesus Christ. We make every effort to ensure that our practices follow our beliefs. Forcing Health Services to be part of the distribution of abortificient agents is an affront to our principles and sends an inaccurate message to our students. Requiring coverage of abortificient agents is in direct contradiction to the spiritual and behavioral standards that Calvin College expects of ourselves and our students.

Plan B and Ella should not be considered equivalent to cancer screening or vaccinations. Pregnancy is not a disease. This is a premise that I reject both religiously and medically.

Even when Americans hold vastly different views on the sanctity of life, this mandate raises a point that should be examined by all: do we value religious freedom in our country or not? Further, the mandate elevates contraception and abortive drugs to the level of preventative health care. They are not. Plan B and Ella should not be considered equivalent to cancer screening or vaccinations. Pregnancy is not a disease. This is a premise that I reject both religiously and medically.

Recently the White House purported to offer an accommodation-perhaps the most fundamental flaw of which is that religious liberties are not something that any president has the legal authority to recognize or deny. As Christians, we believe these rights come from God, and as US citizens, we believe our Constitution affirms and guarantees our right to religious liberty. There is a limit to what government can compel us to do or not do particularly in matters of faith and conscience. It is in the best interest of all Americans, of every ideological stripe, that this limit, this line, not be crossed.

This is not about politics, this is not about contraception, and this is not about depriving women of health care. Rather, this is personal. This is about my daily life as a physician, a Christian, and a Medical Services Director. Whether I will be able as a physician to practice medicine within my belief system. Whether Calvin College will be able to continue its historic tradition of living out the faith it teaches. A government that is of the people, by the people, and for the people, should not force the people to violate their consciences.

I oppose this mandate for the reasons and rationale above. I respectfully request your help so that Calvin College does not have to violate its religious beliefs.