Letter to President Barack Obama
From 60 Non-Catholic Organizations
Regulation 45 CFR Part 147 (2011)
Mr. President, religious organizations beyond the
Catholic community have deep moral objections to a requirement that their
health insurance plans must cover abortifacients. Religious organizations
beyond the Catholic community object to the current narrow exemption which
puts them outside the definition of "religious employers." And religious
organizations beyond the Catholic community object to any revision of the
exemption that would limit it to churches and denominationally affiliated
organizations.
Dec. 21, 2011
The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
We write to express our deep concern about the contraceptives mandate in
the health insurance regulations, and about the "religious employer"
exemption that is so narrow that it does not protect most faith-based
organizations.
We write to you specifically as organizations and leaders that are not
part of the Catholic community. We write not in opposition to Catholic
leaders and organizations; rather, we write in solidarity, but separately-to
stress that religious organizations and leaders of other faiths are also
deeply troubled by and opposed to the mandate and the narrow exemption.
Most press reports on the controversy concerning the contraceptives
mandate portray the opposition as coming only from the Catholic Church and
Catholic organizations. But this is wrong. It is emphatically not only
Catholics who deeply object to the requirement that health plans they
purchase must provide coverage of contraceptives that include some that are
abortifacients. It is not only Catholics who object to the narrow exemption
that protects only seminaries and a few churches, but not churches with a
social outreach and other faith-based organizations that serve the poor and
needy broadly providing help that goes beyond worship and prayer.
The faith-based organizations and religious traditions represented by the
undersigned leaders do not all share the same convictions about the moral
acceptability of the mandated services. But we are all deeply concerned
about the narrow exemption, including proposals made to expand it while
still leaving unprotected many faith-based organizations. Many of us
previously signed a letter, dated August 26, 2011, to Joshua DuBois, head of
the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, asking
his help in persuading your administration, if it maintains the
contraceptives mandate, to replace the current "inaccurately narrow and
practically inadequate definition of 'religious employer'." An organization
does not cease to be a religious organization just because it serves the
poor and needy in material ways and does not confine its help to prayer and
religious teaching.
We reiterate our opposition to the narrow exemption. We wish to stress
that we strongly object to a revised exemption that is only broadened enough
to include faith-based organizations that are affiliated with a specific
denomination. We understand that such a compromise has been proposed to your
administration. The suggested compromise discriminates against the many
religions that organize themselves in ways other than by being centered on a
denomination.
Some faith-based organizations have an interdenominational or ecumenical
affiliation. Yet others are linked with houses of worship that are not
denominational at all. And a significant number of faith-based organizations
are not affiliated formally with any house of worship or denomination.
Rather, they are, and are considered in Federal law to be, religious
organizations because of their religious mission, their faith-shaped
internal operations, and their presentation of themselves to the community
as religious organizations.1
Mr. President, religious organizations beyond the Catholic community have
deep moral objections to a requirement that their health insurance plans
must cover abortifacients. Religious organizations beyond the Catholic
community object to the current narrow exemption which puts them outside the
definition of "religious employers." And religious organizations beyond the
Catholic community object to any revision of the exemption that would limit
it to churches and denominationally affiliated organizations.
We believe that the Federal government is obligated by the First
Amendment to accommodate the religious convictions of faith-based
organizations of all kinds, Catholic and non-Catholic. We respectfully ask
that your administration, should it maintain the current contraceptives
mandate, devise an exemption for religious employers that accurately defines
such employers and exempts them from being required to offer to their
employees (and students, if they are among America's many religious colleges
and universities) health services to which they have deep religious
objections. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Leith Anderson, President, National Association of Evangelicals
Wayne L Gordon, President, Christian Community Development Association
John Ashmen, President, Association of Gospel Rescue Missions
Jim Liske, CEO, Prison Fellowship Ministries
Fred L. Potter, Esq., Executive Director and CEO, Christian Legal Society
Colby M. May, Esq., Director & Senior Counsel, Washington Office,
American Center for Law & Justice
Dr. Richard Land, President, The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission,
Southern Baptist Convention
Tom Minnery, Senior Vice President, Focus on the Family
Stanley Carlson-Thies, President, Institutional Religious Freedom
Alliance
Nathan Diament, Executive Director for Public Policy, Union of Orthodox
Jewish Congregations of America
Rabbi Abba Cohen, Vice President for Federal Affairs and Washington
Director, Agudath Israel of America
Dr. Gary M. Benedict, President, The Christian and Missionary Alliance
Dr. George O. Wood, General Superintendent, The General Council of the
Assemblies of God
Stephanie Summers, Chief Executive Officer, Center for Public Justice
Ron Sider, President, Evangelicals for Social Action
Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, President, National Hispanic Christian Leadership
Conference/
Hispanic Evangelical Association
John Holmes, Ed.D., Director of Government Affairs, Association of
Christian Schools
International
Dr. Keith Wiebe, President, American Association of Christian Schools
Dr. Jo Anne Lyon, Chair, Board of General Superintendents, The Wesleyan
Church
Everett Piper, PhD, President, Oklahoma Wesleyan University
Shirley A. Mullen, President, Houghton College
Henry Smith, President, Indiana Wesleyan University
Dr. Todd S. Voss, President, Southern Wesleyan University
Tom Armiger, CEO, World Hope International
Andrew Sears, Executive Director, TechMission
Jay Van Groningen, Executive Director, Communities First Association
Karen Woods, Cornerstone Community Resources
Bruce Miller, CEO, Lawndale Christian Health Center
Rev. Steven E. Boes, President and National Executive Director, Boys Town
Paul R. Corts, President, Council for Christian Colleges & Universities
Robert C. Andringa, Ph.D., President Emeritus, Council for Christian
Colleges & Universities
Robert H. Spence, President, Evangel University, The National Assemblies
of God University of Arts, Sciences & Professions, Springfield, Missouri
Carl E. Zylstra, President, Dordt College
Gordon L. Anderson, Ph.D., President, North Central University
Dr. Todd J. Williams, President, Philadelphia Biblical University
Charles H. Webb, PhD, President, Spring Arbor University
Dr. Lee G. Royce, President, Mississippi College
Jerry B. Cain, President, Judson University
Rick Mann, PhD, President, Crown College
William L. Armstrong, President, Colorado Christian University
Samuel W. "Dub" Oliver, Ph.D., President, East Texas Baptist University
Dr. John C. Bowling, President, Olivet Nazarene University
Joseph Castleberry, Ed.D., President, Northwest University
Dr. Charles W. Pollard, President, John Brown University
Dr. Barbara Bellefeuille, Provost, Toccoa Falls College
Dr. Roger Parrott, President, Belhaven University
Dr John Jackson, President, William Jessup University
Dan Boone, President, Trevecca Nazarene University
Mike E. O'Neal, President, Oklahoma Christian University
Paul J. Maurer, President, Sterling College
James H Barnes III, President, Bethel University
Bob Brower, President, Point Loma Nazarene University
David W. Olive, President, Bluefield College
Jules Glanzer, President, Tabor College
Dr. Loren E. Swartzendruber, President, Eastern Mennonite University
Dr. David C. Alexander, President, Northwest Nazarene University
William M. B. Fleming, Jr., Interim President, Palm Beach Atlantic
University
Eric Strattan, lead pastor, Bridge Bible Church, Muskegon, MI
Gail Kraft, Executive Director, Love INC of Muskegon
Case Hoogendoorn, Senior Partner, Hoogendoorn & Talbot LLP, Chicago
Stephen V. Monsma, Senior Research Fellow, The Henry Institute, Calvin
College
Notes
1. See, e.g., LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Community
Center, 503 F.3d 217 (3rd Cir. 2007), addressing what is a "religious
organization" for purposes of the religious employer exemption in sec.
702(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Mindful of the First
Amendment implications, the Court In Leboon sets down a nine-factor test for
determining if an organization is religious. Ibid. at 226. The non-profit
religious association in LeBoon is found by the Court to be a religious
organization even though it is not formally linked to synagogues in the same
community. Ibid. 227.