The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario is facing a court challenge by the Christian Medical and Dental Society and the Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies. They have filed an application in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice asking for an injunction against enforcement of the College’s controversial new policy, Professional Obligations and Human Rights. According to the application the College acknowledged that it had received 15,977 submissions during the second consultation concerning the policy, which ended on 20 February, 2015. The great majority of submissions opposed the policy.
While the consultation ended on 20 February, a working group wrote the final version of the policy by 11 February, at least nine days before the consultation closed. This is one of the factors that gives rise to concern about what the CMDS application calls either “actual bias” or “a reasonable apprehension of bias” on the part of the working group.
On this point, the statistics provided by the College are of interest.
According to the briefing note supplied to the College Council, by 11 February, 2015 the College had received 3,105 submissions. This means that 12,872 submissions were received from 12 to 20 February inclusive. In other words, over 80% of the submissions in the second consultation were received after the final version of the policy was written.
Moreover, allowing sufficient time to receive feedback is only the beginning. Having received them, one would expect that a working group seriously interested in feedback would allow sufficient time to review and analyse the submissions.
During the 64 days of consultation ending 11 February, the College received an average of almost 50 submissions per day. There were 43 working days during that period. Assuming someone spent eight full hours every working day reading the submissions, it would have taken one person about seven minutes to review each one.
However, during the nine days of consultation ending 20 February, the College received an average of 60 submissions every hour. With 16 working days available from 12 February to 5 March inclusive, the day before the Council meeting, one person reading eight hours a day would have had no more than 36 seconds to review each submission.
Presumably this will be one of the issues to which the attention of the court will be directed if the case goes to trial.